mark in dana point, california, you've been very patient. please, go ahead. >> caller: melanie, you have a number of interesting beliefs that need to be explored. however, you lose credibility with the scientific community when you claim that the scientific method was not used to establish the facts about global warming as caused by humans' burning of fossil fuels. the scientific method was used extensively in the 1970s and the '80s, and the predictions started coming true in the early '90s. and the only claim that you can make against the scientists in this area is that they understated the significance of this problem. and today we have a situationing where 97% of the top 200 climate scientists are diametrically opposed to your beliefs. your beliefs are parallelled by sarah palin from the state of alaska and senator inhofe, the state of oklahoma, tw states that economies -- two states that economies are based on burning fossil fuels. you need to rethis think this so -- rethink this saw that you get -- so that you get on the right side of t